首页> 外文OA文献 >Retrospective Evaluation of the Outcome of Open Versus Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy for Stage I and II Adrenocortical Cancer
【2h】

Retrospective Evaluation of the Outcome of Open Versus Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy for Stage I and II Adrenocortical Cancer

机译:回顾性评估开放式与腹腔镜肾上腺切除术治疗I期和II期肾上腺皮质癌的疗效

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: \ud\udAlthough there is consensus that laparoscopy is the standard of care for the resection of benign adrenal tumours, there is controversy regarding the role of laparoscopy for the resection of adrenocortical cancer (ACC).\ud\udOBJECTIVE: \ud\udThe aim of the present study was to review the ACC database of the San Luigi Hospital to compare the oncologic effectiveness of open adrenalectomy (OA) versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) in the treatment of patients with stage I and II ACC.\ud\udDESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: \ud\udWe performed a retrospective analysis involving 43 patients with stage I and II ACC who had undergone radical surgery.\ud\udINTERVENTION: \ud\udThe patients were stratified into two groups according to the surgical procedure. The "open group" consisted of patients treated with OA; the "lap group" consisted of patients treated with LA.\ud\udMEASUREMENTS: \ud\udOncologic effectiveness of the procedures was tested comparing the recurrence-free survival of patients treated with OA versus LA. Secondary outcome measures were differences in terms of type of recurrence and overall survival.\ud\udRESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: \ud\udThe open group consisted of 25 patients and the lap group of 18 patients. The two groups were comparable in terms of demographic data. The median follow-up was 38 mo in the open group and 30 mo in the lap group. Recurrence rate was 64% in the open group and 50% in the lap group. The median recurrence-free survival was 18 mo in the open group and 23 in the lap group (p=0.8). No differences in terms of pattern of recurrences were recorded. During follow-up, 28% of the open group patients and 5% of the lap group patients died. No differences in terms of survival time were noted (p=0.3).\ud\udCONCLUSIONS: \ud\udThe present findings provide interesting evidence that OA and LA may be comparable in terms of recurrence-free survival for patients with stage I and II ACC when the principles of surgical oncology are respected.
机译:背景:\ ud \ ud尽管腹腔镜检查是切除良性肾上腺肿瘤的标准治疗方法,但关于腹腔镜检查在切除肾上腺皮质癌(ACC)中的作用存在争议。\ ud \ udOBJECTIVE:\ ud \ ud:本研究的目的是回顾圣路易医院的ACC数据库,以比较开放式肾上腺切除术(OA)与腹腔镜肾上腺切除术(LA)在I和II期ACC患者中的治疗效果。\ ud \ udDESIGN ,地点和参与者:ud我们回顾性分析了43例接受过根治性手术的I期和II期ACC患者。ud ud干预:ud根据所采用的手术方法将患者分为两组。 “开放组”由接受OA治疗的患者组成。 “大腿组”由接受过LA治疗的患者组成。\ ud \ ud测量:\ ud \ ud比较了OA和LA治疗的患者的无复发生存率,测试了该程序的肿瘤学有效性。次要结局指标是复发类型和总生存期方面的差异。\ ud \ ud结果与局限性:\ ud \ ud开放组由25例患者组成,膝部组18例。两组在人口数据方面具有可比性。开放组中位随访时间为38 mo,膝部组中位随访时间为30 mo。开放组的复发率为64%,膝上组的复发率为50%。在开放组中,无复发生存的中位数为18 mo,在膝部组中为23(p = 0.8)。没有记录到复发模式方面的差异。在随访期间,有28%的开放组患者和5%的膝部组患者死亡。结论:\ ud \ ud结论:\ ud \ ud目前的发现提供了有趣的证据,就I和II期患者的无复发生存率而言,OA和LA相当。遵守外科肿瘤学原则的ACC。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号